trioprize.blogg.se

Dare to cross shark bridge
Dare to cross shark bridge





dare to cross shark bridge

DARE TO CROSS SHARK BRIDGE HOW TO

Thus, the two Nicoles should have the info they need to figure out what happened and how to fix it, but the story claims they don't. Second, unless Past Nicole was destroyed before the story started - and Word Of God confirmed she wasn't - both Nicoles should exist at the same time.

dare to cross shark bridge

No way you can claim it to be the one true future, in that case. First of all, the story was built around time needing to be fixed to prevent The End of the World as We Know It, and Ken's run ended with Sonic going back in time to do just that.

  • According to Penders' original idea: M:25YL is supposed to be the "true" future, and the one where Nicole came from, which doesn't really make that much sense.
  • So are the Freedom Fighters homophobic, then? only that suggests that Rotor's homosexuality is blackmail material. The implication from that is that Eggman is planning to blackmail Rotor.
  • Also according to Penders, this was the significance of a bit in #157 where Eggman calls him "dear Rotor" and Sonic assumes this means Eggman knows something he doesn't.
  • Ignoring the fact that having Rotor only be gay in the future means nothing to the readers, having Rotor find out that he's gay so late in life, and during what's implied to be a long and fulfilling marriage, really strains the credibility of this reveal.
  • Rotor's Word of Gay reveal would not have impacted his modern-day depiction he would've only realized he was gay five years prior to the events of Mobius: 25 Years Later.
  • If that's so, why doesn't Knuckles have cancer, even though he resulted from those same experiments?
  • Locke's sickness and death was due to cancer he developed from a bad interaction with his self-experimentation to create Knuckles and the Master Emerald.
  • When talking about What Could Have Been with his run on the Sonic the Hedgehog (Archie Comics) comic, several of former writer Ken Penders' explanations for the events in "Mobius: 25 Years Later" come off as only creating more plot holes than they fixed.
  • dare to cross shark bridge

    Can overlap with Misaimed "Realism", where attempts at making a game more realistic have unrealistic consequences. Dan Browned can be considered similar, in that specific knowledge about the subject at hand causes the hand wave or attempt to justify the trope to fall apart. Also compare to It Runs on Nonsensoleum, in which an explanation like this is played for laughs instead of presented straight. Compare also to Justified Trope, except a Voodoo Shark moment requires the justification to fall flat, inadequately justify, or otherwise simply fail so that suspension of disbelief remains lost. Compare to Author's Saving Throw in that not only is it on a plot device level, and that the creative staff is able to catch it before the final product ever leaves for production, but also in that it tends to fail miserably. Similar to Audience-Alienating Era but specific to an episode's plot device. What makes it the trope namer is that the writer doesn't bother to answer the question of why the voodoo curse was made in the first place, or any of the other countless questions that come to mind. A voodoo curse had been placed on Martin and his family to explain how a shark understands the concept of revenge and how it's able to keep finding these people. Coined by Chuck Sonnenberg, the term refers to the novelization of Jaws: The Revenge where the eponymous shark seeks out and attacks the living relatives and friends of Martin Brody, following them all the way to the Bahamas.







    Dare to cross shark bridge